On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:17:21AM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As comments at PR65767 and PR65718, we should use namespace other than std
> > to avoid duplicated definition problem on arm-none-eabi. This patch fixes
> > the is
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> As comments at PR65767 and PR65718, we should use namespace other than std
> to avoid duplicated definition problem on arm-none-eabi. This patch fixes
> the issue. It is an obvious change, but I will wait for approval because of
> GCC5 br
Hi,
As comments at PR65767 and PR65718, we should use namespace other than std
to avoid duplicated definition problem on arm-none-eabi. This patch fixes
the issue. It is an obvious change, but I will wait for approval because of
GCC5 branch.
Is it OK?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2015-04-20 Bin Che
