On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:37 AM Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 8:19 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:35 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:01 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:28 PM Richard Biener
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 8:19 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:35 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:01 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:28 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:35 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:01 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:28 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM bin.cheng via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > >
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:01 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:28 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM bin.cheng via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > As described in patch summary, this fixes the wrong code issue by adding
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:28 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM bin.cheng via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > As described in patch summary, this fixes the wrong code issue by adding
> > overflow-ness
> > check for iv1.step - iv2.step.
> >
> > Bootstr
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM bin.cheng via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> As described in patch summary, this fixes the wrong code issue by adding
> overflow-ness
> check for iv1.step - iv2.step.
>
> Bootstrap and test on x86_64. Any comments?
+ bool wrap_p = TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (step_t
Hi,
As described in patch summary, this fixes the wrong code issue by adding
overflow-ness
check for iv1.step - iv2.step.
Bootstrap and test on x86_64. Any comments?
Thanks,
bin
pr100740-20210525.txt
Description: Binary data