Re: Re: [PATCH IRA] save a bitmap check

2015-06-25 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
I can be of more beneficial :-) Cheers Zhouyi > -Original Messages- > From: "Vladimir Makarov" > Sent Time: Thursday, June 25, 2015 > To: "Zhouyi Zhou" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: [PATCH IRA] save a bitmap check > > On 06

Re: [PATCH IRA] save a bitmap check

2015-06-25 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 06/25/2015 11:08 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: On 06/24/2015 05:54 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: In function assign_hard_reg, checking the bit of conflict_a in consideration_allocno_bitmap is unneccesary, because when retry_p is false, conflicting objects are always inside of the same loop_node (this

Re: [PATCH IRA] save a bitmap check

2015-06-25 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 06/24/2015 05:54 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: In function assign_hard_reg, checking the bit of conflict_a in consideration_allocno_bitmap is unneccesary, because when retry_p is false, conflicting objects are always inside of the same loop_node (this is ensured in function process_bb_node_lives whic

Re: [PATCH IRA] save a bitmap check

2015-06-24 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/24/2015 03:54 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: In function assign_hard_reg, checking the bit of conflict_a in consideration_allocno_bitmap is unneccesary, because when retry_p is false, conflicting objects are always inside of the same loop_node (this is ensured in function process_bb_node_lives whi

[PATCH IRA] save a bitmap check

2015-06-24 Thread Zhouyi Zhou
In function assign_hard_reg, checking the bit of conflict_a in consideration_allocno_bitmap is unneccesary, because when retry_p is false, conflicting objects are always inside of the same loop_node (this is ensured in function process_bb_node_lives which marks the living objects to death near t