On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>>>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
Given only integer variables are meaningful for register p
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Given only integer variables are meaningful for register pressure
>>> estimation in IVOPTs,
>>> this patch skips non-int
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Given only integer variables are meaningful for register pressure estimation
>> in IVOPTs,
>> this patch skips non-integer type PHIs when counting register pressure.
>> Is it OK?
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Given only integer variables are meaningful for register pressure estimation
> in IVOPTs,
> this patch skips non-integer type PHIs when counting register pressure.
> Is it OK?
Huh. I suppose it only makes a difference because you are ig
Hi,
Given only integer variables are meaningful for register pressure estimation in
IVOPTs,
this patch skips non-integer type PHIs when counting register pressure.
Is it OK?
Thanks,
bin
2017-04-11 Bin Cheng
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (determine_set_costs): Skip non-interger
when