On 4/10/25 12:34 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/8/25 10:29 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
The template arguments aren't dependent however -- they're just
incomplete because when we deferred them we were in the middle
deduction, and we consider a NULL_TREE template argument as dependent.
I wonder what
On 4/8/25 10:29 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
OK.
-- >8 --
Here we substitute into the inner lambda twice, first during default
argument substitution for the outer template parameters, then during
that for the inner t
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Here we substitute into the inner lambda twice, first during default
argument substitution for the outer template parameters, then during
that for the inner template parameters.
For the second testcase (whic
