Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-05-10 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 3 May 2016 at 11:07, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed,

Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-05-10 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 3 May 2016 at 11:07, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > Curren

Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-05-03 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: Hi, Currently tree if-conversion only supports PHIs with no mo

Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-05-02 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Currently tree if-conversion only supports PHIs with no more than two >>> arguments unless the loop is marked with "simd

Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-04-29 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Currently tree if-conversion only supports PHIs with no more than two >>> arguments unless the loop is marked with "simd

Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-04-29 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: >> Hi, >> Currently tree if-conversion only supports PHIs with no more than two >> arguments unless the loop is marked with "simd pragma". This patch makes >> such PHIs supported uncondi

Re: [PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-04-28 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > Currently tree if-conversion only supports PHIs with no more than two > arguments unless the loop is marked with "simd pragma". This patch makes > such PHIs supported unconditionally if they have no more than MAX_PHI_ARG_NUM > arguments

[PATCH GCC]Do more tree if-conversions by handlding PHIs with more than two arguments.

2016-04-27 Thread Bin Cheng
Hi, Currently tree if-conversion only supports PHIs with no more than two arguments unless the loop is marked with "simd pragma". This patch makes such PHIs supported unconditionally if they have no more than MAX_PHI_ARG_NUM arguments, thus cases like PR56541 can be fixed. Note because a chain