Am 07.09.2014 um 03:48 schrieb Ed Smith-Rowland:
> Greetings,
>
> I am finally getting back to my SD-6 C++ features test work.
>
> This adds front end and preprocessor tests for the language feature tests and
> __has_include.
>
> I am still working on the fifth and last in this series to add
> _
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 10:08 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 02:51 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/01/2014 11:28 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/09/14 10:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
=
On 02/10/14 02:51 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/01/2014 11:28 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Ed, the commit at http://gcc.gnu.org/r215752 doesn't have the
corrections I asked for above and causes a number of test failures,
could you look into it please?
OK,
Here is the patch.
Built and t
On 10/02/2014 02:51 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/01/2014 11:28 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/09/14 10:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
===
On 10/01/2014 11:28 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/09/14 10:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
===
--- include/bits/stl_function.h(revision 214
On 10/01/14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/09/14 10:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>>Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
>>===
>>--- include/bits/stl_function.h (revision 214680)
On 02/09/14 10:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
===
--- include/bits/stl_function.h (revision 214680)
+++ include/bits/stl_function.h (working copy)
On 09/29/2014 11:18 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ /* Nonzero to prevent macro expansion. */
+ unsigned char in__has_include__;
I don't see anything checking this flag to prevent macro expansion.
Does the comment just need a change?
+ /* Binary literals and variable length arrays hav
On 09/25/2014 12:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/01/2014 09:34 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
(open_file_failed()): Not an error to not find a header file for
__has_include__.
Hmm, looks like this means that __has_include__ will silently return
false if a header exists but is unreadabl
On 09/25/2014 12:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/01/2014 09:34 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
(open_file_failed()): Not an error to not find a header file for
__has_include__.
Hmm, looks like this means that __has_include__ will silently return
false if a header exists but is unreadabl
On 09/26/2014 10:20 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 09/25/2014 01:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Don't we support attribute deprecated in C++11?
We support [[gnu::deprecated]] in C++11 bit not [[deprecated]] until C++14.
Hmm, that seems unnecessary. I'd allow it in C++11 as well, and *maybe*
c
On 09/25/2014 01:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/01/2014 09:41 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_attribute_deprecated=201309");
Don't we support attribute deprecated in C++11?
Jason
We support [[gnu::deprecated]] in C++11 bit not [[deprecated]] until C++14.
Ed
On 09/01/2014 09:41 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_attribute_deprecated=201309");
Don't we support attribute deprecated in C++11?
Jason
On 09/01/2014 09:41 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ /* Return type deduction was added as an extension to C++11
+and was standardized for C+14. */
+ cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_return_type_deduction=201304");
When I try to use it with -std=c++11 I get
wa.C:1:8: error:
On 09/01/2014 09:34 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
(open_file_failed()): Not an error to not find a header file for
__has_include__.
Hmm, looks like this means that __has_include__ will silently return
false if a header exists but is unreadable; I would think that we want
it to b
*PING*
I would like review of my SD-6 implementation.
Part 1 - __has_include__ built-in in libcpp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00083.html
Part 2 - __has_include macro and C++ language feature macros.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00084.html
Part 3 - libstdc++
Greetings,
I am finally getting back to my SD-6 C++ features test work.
This adds front end and preprocessor tests for the language feature tests and
__has_include.
I am still working on the fifth and last in this series to add
__had_cpp_attribute but these first four patches add a very usefu
On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
===
--- include/bits/stl_function.h (revision 214680)
+++ include/bits/stl_function.h (working copy)
@@ -217,6 +217,10 @@
};
#if __cplusplus > 2
On Sep 1, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
> (I sort of wonder why this wasn't added to the actual preprocessor 20 years
> ago.)
:-)
So can you hack the system at template expansion time yet? :-)
std::shell<“/bin/sh -c …”> maybe?
On Monday 01 September 2014 21:58:47 Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> The Fourth installment, testing and other oddments will be sent tomorrow.
>
> The implementation of __has_cpp_attribute is underway and will come in a
> few days as a Fifth installment (modulo bugs this should be all).
> I have it work
The Fourth installment, testing and other oddments will be sent tomorrow.
The implementation of __has_cpp_attribute is underway and will come in a
few days as a Fifth installment (modulo bugs this should be all).
I have it working in C++.
I feel though that it would be welcome as it is in clang
Greetings,
I am finally getting back to my SD-6 C++ features test work.
This adds feature macros to various libstdc++ components.
The new version of SD-6 cleans up the shared_mutex noise.
Some libraries that were moved to different tSen are still given macros as they
are in the SD-6 draft.
Bo
Greetings,
I am finally getting back to my SD-6 C++ features test work.
This second part adds a __has_include function-like macro that will
return true if a header exists. I also added a __has_include_next
function-like macro as an extension. Clang has this extension.
These macros just wrap t
Greetings,
I am finally getting back to my SD-6 C++ features test work.
This first part adds a __has_include__ built-in that will return true if
a header exists.
I also added __has_include_next__ as an extension. Clang has this
extension.
Both these built-ins will be wrapped in function type
24 matches
Mail list logo
