On 22/06/18 14:56, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 17/05/18 09:29, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 16/05/18 10:22, Jérôme Lambourg wrote:
>> Hello Kyrill,
>>
>>> Thanks for the patch! To validate it your changes you can also look
>>> at the disassembly
>>> of the cmse.c binary in the build tree. If
On 17/05/18 09:29, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 16/05/18 10:22, Jérôme Lambourg wrote:
>> Hello Kyrill,
>>
>>> Thanks for the patch! To validate it your changes you can also look
>>> at the disassembly
>>> of the cmse.c binary in the build tree. If the binary changes with
>>> your patch then that
On 16/05/18 10:22, Jérôme Lambourg wrote:
Hello Kyrill,
Thanks for the patch! To validate it your changes you can also look at the
disassembly
of the cmse.c binary in the build tree. If the binary changes with your patch
then that
would indicate some trouble.
Good idea. So I just did that a
Hello Kyrill,
> Thanks for the patch! To validate it your changes you can also look at the
> disassembly
> of the cmse.c binary in the build tree. If the binary changes with your patch
> then that
> would indicate some trouble.
Good idea. So I just did that and the assembly of both objects are
Hi Jérôme,
On 15/05/18 11:53, Jérôme Lambourg wrote:
Hello gcc-patch list,
While trying to build a x86_64-linux hosted cross arm bare metal compiler with
both --with-multilib-list=rmprofile and --without-headers, the libgcc build
fails while trying to build the armv8-m variant with the followin
Hello gcc-patch list,
While trying to build a x86_64-linux hosted cross arm bare metal compiler with
both --with-multilib-list=rmprofile and --without-headers, the libgcc build
fails while trying to build the armv8-m variant with the following message:
In file included from .../build/gcc/include/
