On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:53:41AM +0100, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM, James Greenhalgh
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:15:04PM +, Bin Cheng wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> After change @236817, AArch64 backend could avoid unnecessary conversion
> >> instructions for regis
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:15:04PM +, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> After change @236817, AArch64 backend could avoid unnecessary conversion
>> instructions for register between different modes now. As a result, GCC
>> could initialize
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:15:04PM +, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> After change @236817, AArch64 backend could avoid unnecessary conversion
> instructions for register between different modes now. As a result, GCC
> could initialize register in larger mode and use it later in smaller mode.
> such
Hi,
After change @236817, AArch64 backend could avoid unnecessary conversion
instructions
for register between different modes now. As a result, GCC could initialize
register
in larger mode and use it later in smaller mode. such def-use chain is not
supported
by current regrename.c analyzer, a