Re: [PATCH 9d] Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions

2017-01-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/10/2017 06:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: gcc/ChangeLog: * final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions. Heh, so you are lucky that nothing looks at this. MEM_EXPRs can contain SSA name

Re: [PATCH 9d] Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions

2017-01-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/09/2017 07:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote: gcc/ChangeLog: * final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions. OK. And just for the record, these patches were submitted prior to stage1 close. I'm hesitant to go forward with them unless the set as

Re: [PATCH 9d] Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions

2017-01-10 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > gcc/ChangeLog: > * final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Don't call delete_tree_ssa for > __RTL functions. Heh, so you are lucky that nothing looks at this. MEM_EXPRs can contain SSA names these days (for points-to info), but I sup

[PATCH 9d] Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions

2017-01-09 Thread David Malcolm
gcc/ChangeLog: * final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions. --- gcc/final.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/final.c b/gcc/final.c index 8a4c9f8..2483381 100644 --- a/gcc/final.c +++ b/gcc/final.c @@ -4699