On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:44:26PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 11:43 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >>Well, that's a backport of ancient patch from trunk so all credits go
> >>there. And flag_sanitize is indeed handled differently from other
> >>compiler flags.
> >
> >Really curious to kn
On 10/17/2014 11:43 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Well, that's a backport of ancient patch from trunk so all credits go
there. And flag_sanitize is indeed handled differently from other
compiler flags.
Really curious to know why...
I bet this was a typo but let's wait for Jakub's comments.
-Y
> Well, that's a backport of ancient patch from trunk so all credits go
> there. And flag_sanitize is indeed handled differently from other
> compiler flags.
Really curious to know why...
--
Eric Botcazou
On 10/17/2014 11:27 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
The patch was slightly updated to take care of missing UBSan work
(SANITIZE_FLOAT_DIVIDE, SANITIZE_FLOAT_CAST, SANITIZE_BOUNDS).
--- a/gcc/opts.c
+++ b/gcc/opts.c
@@ -868,6 +868,20 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct
gcc_options *opts
> The patch was slightly updated to take care of missing UBSan work
> (SANITIZE_FLOAT_DIVIDE, SANITIZE_FLOAT_CAST, SANITIZE_BOUNDS).
--- a/gcc/opts.c
+++ b/gcc/opts.c
@@ -868,6 +868,20 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct
gcc_options *opts_set,
/* The -gsplit-dwarf option requir
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:39:56PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> The patch was slightly updated to take care of missing UBSan work
> (SANITIZE_FLOAT_DIVIDE, SANITIZE_FLOAT_CAST, SANITIZE_BOUNDS).
> 2014-10-15 Yury Gribov
>
> Backport from mainline
> 2014-07-31 Yury Gribov
>
>
The patch was slightly updated to take care of missing UBSan work
(SANITIZE_FLOAT_DIVIDE, SANITIZE_FLOAT_CAST, SANITIZE_BOUNDS).
2014-10-15 Yury Gribov
Backport from mainline
2014-07-31 Yury Gribov
* doc/cpp.texi (__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__): Updated description.
* doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitiz
