On 10/18/2015 05:55 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:56 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
The generators should simply unconditionally check (not in generated
files, of course).
And the generated code parts should use flag_checking.
Richard.
genautomata has some macros similar to tree chec
On 10/21/2015 04:49 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:56 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
The generators should simply unconditionally check (not in generated
files, of course).
And the generated code parts should use flag_checking.
Ri
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:56 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> The generators should simply unconditionally check (not in generated
>> files, of course).
>> And the generated code parts should use flag_checking.
>>
>> Richard.
>
> genautomata has some ma
On 10/06/2015 03:56 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> The generators should simply unconditionally check (not in generated
> files, of course).
> And the generated code parts should use flag_checking.
>
> Richard.
genautomata has some macros similar to tree checks, so I avoided changing them.
gencondit
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2015-10-05 Mikhail Maltsev
>
> * genautomata.c: Use CHECKING_P instead of ENABLE_CHECKING.
> * genconditions.c: Define CHECKING_P in generated code.
> * genextract.c: Use CHECKING_P instead of EN
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-10-05 Mikhail Maltsev
* genautomata.c: Use CHECKING_P instead of ENABLE_CHECKING.
* genconditions.c: Define CHECKING_P in generated code.
* genextract.c: Use CHECKING_P instead of ENABLE_CHECKING.
* gengtype.c (main): Likewise.
* geng
