On 15/11/2023 17:08, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
At the moment we emit a warning whenever you specify both -march and -mcpu
and the architecture of them differ. The idea originally was that the user may
not be aware of this change.
However this has a few problems:
1. Architecture revis
na ;
> >> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> >> Cc: nd ; Richard Earnshaw ;
> >> Marcus Shawcroft ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >> ; Richard Sandiford
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6]AArch64: only emit mismatch error when
> >> features would be disabled.
&
]AArch64: only emit mismatch error when features
would be disabled.
On 15/11/2023 17:08, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
At the moment we emit a warning whenever you specify both -march and
-mcpu and the architecture of them differ. The idea originally was
that the user may not be aware of this
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Earnshaw
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 9:27 AM
> To: Tamar Christina ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nd ; Richard Earnshaw ;
> Marcus Shawcroft ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> ; Richard Sandiford
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6]AArch6
On 15/11/2023 17:08, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
At the moment we emit a warning whenever you specify both -march and -mcpu
and the architecture of them differ. The idea originally was that the user may
not be aware of this change.
However this has a few problems:
1. Architecture revis
Hi All,
At the moment we emit a warning whenever you specify both -march and -mcpu
and the architecture of them differ. The idea originally was that the user may
not be aware of this change.
However this has a few problems:
1. Architecture revisions is not an observable part of the architectur
