On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:16:43AM +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
> That SUBREG vs. REG stuff is annoying. Isn't there a simple function
> that just does the right thing which can be used instead of manually
> open-coding these checks over and over again?
There is reg_or_subregno, which would even work
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:48 +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> 2017-02-21 Segher Boessenkool
>
> * config/sh/sh.md (tstsi_t): If operands[0] is a SUBREG instead of
> a REG, look at the REG it is a SUBREG of.
> (splitter for cmpeqsi_t): Ditto.
>
> ---
> gcc/config/sh/sh.md |
2017-02-21 Segher Boessenkool
* config/sh/sh.md (tstsi_t): If operands[0] is a SUBREG instead of
a REG, look at the REG it is a SUBREG of.
(splitter for cmpeqsi_t): Ditto.
---
gcc/config/sh/sh.md | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff