On 12/09/2011 10:02 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> For Neon a further optimization to consider might be to use the vext
> instruction which could achieve permute masks that are monotonically
> increasing constants ? While I expect the latency for a vext or vtbl
> instruction to be about the same
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 06:02:21PM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 21:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > ---
> > gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h | 3 +
> > gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 527
> > -
> > gcc/config/arm/neon.m
On 8 December 2011 21:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
> ---
> gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h | 3 +
> gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 527
> -
> gcc/config/arm/neon.md | 59
> gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md | 26 ++
>
---
gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h |3 +
gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 527 -
gcc/config/arm/neon.md| 59
gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md | 26 ++
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp |9 +-
5 files changed,
