Tamar Christina writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 10:28 AM
>> To: Tamar Christina
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
>> ; Marcus Shawcroft
>> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 10:28 AM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8]AArch64 aarch64: Make
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi,
>
>
>> This name might cause confusion with the SVE iterators, where FULL means
>> "every bit of the register is used". How about something like VMOVE
>> instead?
>>
>> With this change, I guess VALL_F16 represents "The set of all modes for
>> which the vld1 intrins
gt; To: Richard Sandiford
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> > ; Marcus Shawcroft
> > ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/8]AArch64 aarch64: Make existing V2HF be usable.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > > This name
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/8]AArch64 aarch64: Make existing V2HF be usable.
>
> Hi,
>
>
> > This name might cause confusion with the SVE iterators, where FULL
> > means "every bit of the register is used". How about som
Hi,
> This name might cause confusion with the SVE iterators, where FULL means
> "every bit of the register is used". How about something like VMOVE
> instead?
>
> With this change, I guess VALL_F16 represents "The set of all modes for
> which the vld1 intrinsics are provided" and VMOVE or what
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:59 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8]AArch64 aarch64: Make existing V2
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi All,
>
> The backend has an existing V2HFmode that is used by pairwise operations.
> This mode was however never made fully functional. Amongst other things it
> was
> never declared as a vector type which made it unusable from the mid-end.
>
> It's also lacking an i
Hi All,
The backend has an existing V2HFmode that is used by pairwise operations.
This mode was however never made fully functional. Amongst other things it was
never declared as a vector type which made it unusable from the mid-end.
It's also lacking an implementation for load/stores so reload
