On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 30/10/15 10:54, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> On 30/10/15 10:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you want to use wide-ints here and
>>>
>>> wide_int idx = wi::from (minidx, TYPE_PRECISION (TYPE_DOMAIN
>>> (...)), TYPE_SIGN (TYPE_DOMAIN
On 30/10/15 10:54, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> On 30/10/15 10:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> I think you want to use wide-ints here and
>>
>> wide_int idx = wi::from (minidx, TYPE_PRECISION (TYPE_DOMAIN
>> (...)), TYPE_SIGN (TYPE_DOMAIN (..)));
>> wide_int maxidx = ...
>>
>> you can then simply
> I think you want to use wide-ints here and
>
>wide_int idx = wi::from (minidx, TYPE_PRECISION (TYPE_DOMAIN
> (...)), TYPE_SIGN (TYPE_DOMAIN (..)));
>wide_int maxidx = ...
>
> you can then simply iterate minidx with ++ and do the final compare
> against maxidx
> with while (++idx <= maxi
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> The code I added to completely_scalarize for arrays isn't right in some cases
> of negative array indices (e.g. arrays with indices from -1 to 1 in the Ada
> testsuite). On ARM, this prevents a failure bootstrapping Ada with the next
> patch,
The code I added to completely_scalarize for arrays isn't right in some cases
of negative array indices (e.g. arrays with indices from -1 to 1 in the Ada
testsuite). On ARM, this prevents a failure bootstrapping Ada with the next
patch, as well as a few ACATS tests (e.g. c64106a).
Some discussion
