Re: [PATCH 5/5] use vec in lto_tree_ref_table

2014-11-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:55 AM, wrote: > From: Trevor Saunders > > Hi, > > gengtype fails to create valid user marking functions for this type, which is > fixed by using vec here (which seems cleaner anyway). > > bootstrapped + regtested powerpc64-linux (gcc 110 since gcc20 died) ok? Ok. Than

Re: [PATCH 5/5] use vec in lto_tree_ref_table

2014-11-13 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:52:51PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/12/14 22:55, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote: > >From: Trevor Saunders > > > >Hi, > > > >gengtype fails to create valid user marking functions for this type, which is > >fixed by using vec here (which seems cleaner anyway). > > > >boots

Re: [PATCH 5/5] use vec in lto_tree_ref_table

2014-11-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/12/14 22:55, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote: From: Trevor Saunders Hi, gengtype fails to create valid user marking functions for this type, which is fixed by using vec here (which seems cleaner anyway). bootstrapped + regtested powerpc64-linux (gcc 110 since gcc20 died) ok? Trev gcc/Cha

[PATCH 5/5] use vec in lto_tree_ref_table

2014-11-12 Thread tsaunders
From: Trevor Saunders Hi, gengtype fails to create valid user marking functions for this type, which is fixed by using vec here (which seems cleaner anyway). bootstrapped + regtested powerpc64-linux (gcc 110 since gcc20 died) ok? Trev gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-11-13 Trevor Saunders *