On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:17 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 6:10 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:32 AM Andrew Pinski
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Having a limit of 2 params for NEXT_PASS was just done because I didn't
> > > think there was
> > > a w
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 6:10 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:32 AM Andrew Pinski
> wrote:
> >
> > Having a limit of 2 params for NEXT_PASS was just done because I didn't
> > think there was
> > a way to handle arbitrary number of params. But I found that we can handle
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:32 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> Having a limit of 2 params for NEXT_PASS was just done because I didn't think
> there was
> a way to handle arbitrary number of params. But I found that we can handle
> this
> via a static const variable array (constexpr so we know it is t
Having a limit of 2 params for NEXT_PASS was just done because I didn't think
there was
a way to handle arbitrary number of params. But I found that we can handle this
via a static const variable array (constexpr so we know it is true or false at
compile time)
and just loop over the array.
Note
