H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 9:33 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 08:43:30AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:23 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
My proposal, and what my strawman patch implements, is that gas will
generate a .debug_
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 9:33 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 08:43:30AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:23 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > My proposal, and what my strawman patch implements, is that gas will
> > > generate a .debug_line section when -
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 08:43:30AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:23 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > My proposal, and what my strawman patch implements, is that gas will
> > generate a .debug_line section when -g is given and the debug types is
> > DWARF (just as it does now).
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:23 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 07:34:35AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 5:24 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:38:21PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:38 PM Mark Wielaard
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 07:34:35AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 5:24 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:38:21PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:38 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Would it be possible to have something like the foll
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 5:24 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:38:21PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:38 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to have something like the following in gas, so
> > > that it doesn't try generating a .deb
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:38:21PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:38 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have something like the following in gas, so
> > that it doesn't try generating a .debug_line section if there already
> > is one, even when -gdwarf-N is
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:38 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi gcc hackers, binutils hackers,
>
> Nick, Jakub and I were discussing the gcc patch below and all the ways
> it is wrong. Most things can be fixed in the spec. Like only passing
> -gdwarf if we are generating DWARF and passing the right DW
Hi gcc hackers, binutils hackers,
Nick, Jakub and I were discussing the gcc patch below and all the ways
it is wrong. Most things can be fixed in the spec. Like only passing
-gdwarf if we are generating DWARF and passing the right DWARF version
as -gdwarf-N for the version that gcc itself creates.
This is needed to get DWARF version 5 .debug_line tables.
It is also obviously wrong. It needs a check for whether as supports
--gdwarf- for all versions we support and it should only
be added when generating DWARF debug information for the specific
DWARF version we are generating.
It also needs s
10 matches
Mail list logo
