Re: [PATCH 4/5] State cleanups -- also note for MPX work

2014-10-17 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/16/14 18:41, David Malcolm wrote: Anyway, just thought it was worth explicitly pointing out that these two hunks of work, while they're tackling totally different issues may conflict because of an implementation of the MPX bits. Presumably my state cleanup patch isn't going to break the

Re: [PATCH 4/5] State cleanups -- also note for MPX work

2014-10-16 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 16:06 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote: > > This patch contains various cleanups needed by the jit, so that we can > > rerun the compiler code repeatedly within the same process: > > > > * Introduce per-file finalization routines to clean up file

Re: [PATCH 4/5] State cleanups -- also note for MPX work

2014-10-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote: This patch contains various cleanups needed by the jit, so that we can rerun the compiler code repeatedly within the same process: * Introduce per-file finalization routines to clean up file-static variables. * Make various initializations idempotent (

[PATCH 4/5] State cleanups

2014-10-13 Thread David Malcolm
This patch contains various cleanups needed by the jit, so that we can rerun the compiler code repeatedly within the same process: * Introduce per-file finalization routines to clean up file-static variables. * Make various initializations idempotent (init_ggc), or cleanup their previous stat