On 06/30/2014 02:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/17/2014 09:52 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/13/14 04:48, mliska wrote:
Hi,
many tests rely on a precise number of scanned functions in a dump file. If
IPA ICF decides to merge some function and(or) read-only variables, counts do
not match.
Ma
On 06/17/2014 09:52 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/13/14 04:48, mliska wrote:
Hi,
many tests rely on a precise number of scanned functions in a dump file. If
IPA ICF decides to merge some function and(or) read-only variables, counts do
not match.
Martin
Changelog:
2014-06-13 Martin Liska
On 06/17/2014 10:50 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
On 06/13/14 04:48, mliska wrote:
Hi,
many tests rely on a precise number of scanned functions in a dump file. If
IPA ICF decides to merge some function and(or) read-only variables, counts do
not match.
Martin
Changelog:
201
Jeff Law writes:
> On 06/13/14 04:48, mliska wrote:
>> Hi,
>>many tests rely on a precise number of scanned functions in a dump file.
>> If IPA ICF decides to merge some function and(or) read-only variables,
>> counts do not match.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> 2014-06-13 Martin Lisk
On 06/13/14 04:48, mliska wrote:
Hi,
many tests rely on a precise number of scanned functions in a dump file. If
IPA ICF decides to merge some function and(or) read-only variables, counts do
not match.
Martin
Changelog:
2014-06-13 Martin Liska
Honza Hubicka
* c-c
Hi,
many tests rely on a precise number of scanned functions in a dump file. If
IPA ICF decides to merge some function and(or) read-only variables, counts do
not match.
Martin
Changelog:
2014-06-13 Martin Liska
Honza Hubicka
* c-c++-common/rotate-1.c: Text
*
