On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:34:57PM -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-1.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-2.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-4.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop
2021-05-13 Bill Schmidt
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-1.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-2.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-4.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c: New.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rop
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 08:50:18PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rop-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -mrop-protect" } */
This should only run on ELFv2 currently, no?
> +/* { dg-fi
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:27:45PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/26/21 11:04 AM, will schmidt wrote:
> >Does there need to be another test to verify if -mrop-protect is on by
> >default without specifying -mrop-protect? (or is it?) Question on
> >0/4.
>
> It's off by default (see the Init(0
On 4/26/21 11:04 AM, will schmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2021-04-25 at 20:50 -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
2021-03-25 Bill Schmidt
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-1.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-2.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c: New.
* gc
On Sun, 2021-04-25 at 20:50 -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 2021-03-25 Bill Schmidt
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-1.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-2.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c: New.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/rop-4.c: New.
>
2021-03-25 Bill Schmidt
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-1.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-2.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-4.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c: New.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rop
