On 28/09/20 09:11 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/09/20 00:48 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote:
> Since the standard range adaptors are specified to derive from the empty
> class view_base, making their first data member store
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/09/20 00:48 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote:
> > Since the standard range adaptors are specified to derive from the empty
> > class view_base, making their first data member store the underlying
> > view is suboptimal, for if the underly
On 28/09/20 00:48 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote:
Since the standard range adaptors are specified to derive from the empty
class view_base, making their first data member store the underlying
view is suboptimal, for if the underlying view also derives from
view_base then the two view_ba
Since the standard range adaptors are specified to derive from the empty
class view_base, making their first data member store the underlying
view is suboptimal, for if the underlying view also derives from
view_base then the two view_base subobjects will be adjacent, thus
preventing the compiler f
