On 7/31/13 7:07 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> On 7/25/13 12:41 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
>
> According to Joseph's comment in this discussion thread:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01372.html
>
> Using LGPLv2.1+ with exception seems appropriate for sfp-machine.h.
> So I update our libgc
On 7/25/13 12:41 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> On 7/10/13 8:04 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> There are lots of files in this patch with no copyright or license
>> notices. GNU policy is that every file of more than ten lines needs
>> copyright and license notices (with the libgcc license exception in t
Hi, Joseph,
Sorry for that we have to zip this patch. It seems that the plaintext
revised patch is too large to be sent to mailing list due to lots of
copyright information.
And I am really sorry for that you probably kept receiving the same mail.
Somehow the this [PATCH 3/6] mail just didn't a
There are lots of files in this patch with no copyright or license
notices. GNU policy is that every file of more than ten lines needs
copyright and license notices (with the libgcc license exception in this
case), or a notice that the file is in the public domain.
License notices should be GP
