Hello,
On Thu, May 15 2025, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> starting with GCC 15 the order is not unique for any symtab_nodes but
>> m_uid is, I believe we ought to dump the latter in the ipa-clones dump,
>> if only so that people can reliably match entries about new clones to
>> those about remo
> Hi,
>
> starting with GCC 15 the order is not unique for any symtab_nodes but
> m_uid is, I believe we ought to dump the latter in the ipa-clones dump,
> if only so that people can reliably match entries about new clones to
> those about removed nodes (if any).
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x8
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30 2025, Michal Jires wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 16:10:58 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> starting with GCC 15 the order is not unique for any symtab_nodes but
>> m_uid is, I believe we ought to dump the latter in the ipa-clones dump,
>> if only so that people can rel
On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 16:10:58 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> starting with GCC 15 the order is not unique for any symtab_nodes but
> m_uid is, I believe we ought to dump the latter in the ipa-clones dump,
> if only so that people can reliably match entries about new clones to
> those about
Hi,
starting with GCC 15 the order is not unique for any symtab_nodes but
m_uid is, I believe we ought to dump the latter in the ipa-clones dump,
if only so that people can reliably match entries about new clones to
those about removed nodes (if any).
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK f
