Thanks for the reviews, now committed
Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/31/14 03:15, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> As described in the covering note, it seems better to put the onus of
>> checking the enabled attribute on the passes that are walking each
>> alternative, like LRA does for its internal subpas
On 05/31/14 03:15, Richard Sandiford wrote:
As described in the covering note, it seems better to put the onus of
checking the enabled attribute on the passes that are walking each
alternative, like LRA does for its internal subpasses. That leads
to a nicer interface in patch 4 and would make it
As described in the covering note, it seems better to put the onus of
checking the enabled attribute on the passes that are walking each
alternative, like LRA does for its internal subpasses. That leads
to a nicer interface in patch 4 and would make it easier to precompute
the information at build
