On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:37:22PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > The way the current code was written assumes all cores have an unique part
> > num which is not true. What they have is an unique pair of implementer and
> > part num. T
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> The way the current code was written assumes all cores have an unique part
> num which is not true. What they have is an unique pair of implementer and
> part num. This changes the code to look up that pair after the parsing
> of the two
