Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-29 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/29/2013 01:32 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:25 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: On 07/17/2013 07:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: gcc/ Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create fie

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-29 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:25 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 07/17/2013 07:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > gcc/ > > > > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. > > > > This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create > > fields within the pipeline class for eac

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-29 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 07:56 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:33 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 00:08 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > >> > gcc/ > >> > > >> > Explicitly number the instances

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-24 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:43:04AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:46 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:22:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 20:25 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-23 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:46 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:22:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 20:25 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:18:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > > > gcc/ > > > > > > > > Ex

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-23 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:22:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 20:25 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:18:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > > gcc/ > > > > > > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. > > > > > > This

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-22 Thread David Malcolm
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 20:25 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:18:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > gcc/ > > > > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. > > > > This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create > > fields

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-22 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:18:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > gcc/ > > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. > > This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create > fields within the pipeline class for each pass instance (to help > l

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-18 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/17/2013 07:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: gcc/ Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create fields within the pipeline class for each pass instance (to help locate pass instances when d

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-18 Thread Tom Tromey
> "David" == David Malcolm writes: David> If so, what tools are blessed for usage at build time? (I'd prefer David> Python, but I don't think that's a build-time dep yet). http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Utilities-in-Makefiles.html#Utilities-in-Makefiles Tom

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-18 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:33 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 00:08 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> > gcc/ >> > >> > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. >> > >> > This is needed by a s

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-18 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 00:08 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > gcc/ > > > > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. > > > > This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create > > fields within

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-18 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:18 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > gcc/ > > Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. > > This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create > fields within the pipeline class for each pass instance (to help > locate p

[PATCH 3/4] Introduce NEXT_PASS_NUM macro

2013-07-17 Thread David Malcolm
gcc/ Explicitly number the instances of passes within passes.def. This is needed by a subsequent patch so that we can create fields within the pipeline class for each pass instance (to help locate pass instances when debugging). * passes.c (NEXT_PASS_NUM):