Re: [PATCH 3/3] bpf: Corrected index computation when present with unnamed struct fields

David Faust writes: > On 3/13/24 07:24, Cupertino Miranda wrote: >> Any unnamed structure field if not a member of the BTF_KIND_STRUCT. > typo: if -> is > > I'd suggest to clarify that "any unnamed structure field" is really > any unnamed non-struct-or-union field, since anonymous inner structs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] bpf: Corrected index computation when present with unnamed struct fields

On 3/13/24 07:24, Cupertino Miranda wrote: > Any unnamed structure field if not a member of the BTF_KIND_STRUCT. typo: if -> is I'd suggest to clarify that "any unnamed structure field" is really any unnamed non-struct-or-union field, since anonymous inner structs and unions certainly are prese

[PATCH 3/3] bpf: Corrected index computation when present with unnamed struct fields

Any unnamed structure field if not a member of the BTF_KIND_STRUCT. For that reason, CO-RE access strings indexes should take that in consideration. This patch adds a condition to the incrementer that computes the index for the field access. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/bpf/core-builtins.cc (bp