Re: [PATCH 29/41] analyzer: new file: sm-signal.cc

2020-01-10 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:01 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > Needs review. > > > > Although the comments say "experimental", there are followups > > (using > > function_set) which make this much more production-ready than the > > other sm-*.cc (o

Re: [PATCH 29/41] analyzer: new file: sm-signal.cc

2020-01-10 Thread Jeff Law
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > Needs review. > > Although the comments say "experimental", there are followups (using > function_set) which make this much more production-ready than the > other sm-*.cc (other than malloc). > > Changed in v5: > - update ChangeLog path >

[PATCH 29/41] analyzer: new file: sm-signal.cc

2020-01-08 Thread David Malcolm
Needs review. Although the comments say "experimental", there are followups (using function_set) which make this much more production-ready than the other sm-*.cc (other than malloc). Changed in v5: - update ChangeLog path - updated copyright years to include 2020 New in v4; part of: https://g