On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> Jeff reviewed the v1 version of this patch here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00509.html
> > Given it's not ready for production, fine. Presumably one of the areas
> > for improvement is a better answer to the "what con
Jeff reviewed the v1 version of this patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00509.html
> Given it's not ready for production, fine. Presumably one of the areas
> for improvement is a better answer to the "what constitutes exposure"
> question ;-)
I have followup work using fun
