On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:19:47 +0200
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> On 2020-06-03T14:36:14+0200, I wrote:
> > On 2020-05-22T15:16:05-0700, Julian Brown
> > wrote:
> >> This patch adjusts the semantics of dynamic reference counts, as
> >> described in the parent email.
> >
> > Thanks!
Hi Julian!
On 2020-05-22T15:16:05-0700, Julian Brown wrote:
> --- a/libgomp/oacc-mem.c
> +++ b/libgomp/oacc-mem.c
> @@ -475,14 +475,19 @@ acc_unmap_data (void *h)
>gomp_mutex_unlock (&acc_dev->lock);
>gomp_fatal ("cannot unmap target block");
> }
> - else if (tgt->refcount
Hi Julian!
On 2020-06-03T14:36:14+0200, I wrote:
> On 2020-05-22T15:16:05-0700, Julian Brown wrote:
>> This patch adjusts the semantics of dynamic reference counts, as described
>> in the parent email.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A few questions, but no need to send an updated patch.
>
>> --- a/libgomp/oacc-
Hi Julian!
On 2020-05-22T15:16:05-0700, Julian Brown wrote:
> This patch adjusts the semantics of dynamic reference counts, as described
> in the parent email.
Thanks!
A few questions, but no need to send an updated patch.
> --- a/libgomp/oacc-mem.c
> +++ b/libgomp/oacc-mem.c
> @@ -1018,13 +1
This patch adjusts the semantics of dynamic reference counts, as described
in the parent email. There are also two new test cases derived from
Thomas's test in the email:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546166.html
that work now.
OK?
Julian
ChangeLog
libgomp/
