> From looking at other targets, I think that we need to add
> documentation for -G into the ARC Options section of of
> gcc/doc/invoke.texi.
Added to invoke.texi as suggested.
> Is it critical that we rely on default types here? I know it's
> legitimate, but it just makes me sad to see new cod
On 08/15/2017 07:30 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
* Claudiu Zissulescu [2017-07-24 10:42:54
+0200]:
From: claziss
Add support for -G option to ARC backend.
gcc/
2017-04-24 Claudiu Zissulescu
* config.gcc: Use g.opt for arc.
* config/arc/arc.c (LEGITIMATE_SCALED_ADDRESS_P):
* Claudiu Zissulescu [2017-07-24 10:42:54
+0200]:
> From: claziss
>
> Add support for -G option to ARC backend.
>
> gcc/
> 2017-04-24 Claudiu Zissulescu
>
> * config.gcc: Use g.opt for arc.
> * config/arc/arc.c (LEGITIMATE_SCALED_ADDRESS_P): Deleted,
> functionality move
From: claziss
Add support for -G option to ARC backend.
gcc/
2017-04-24 Claudiu Zissulescu
* config.gcc: Use g.opt for arc.
* config/arc/arc.c (LEGITIMATE_SCALED_ADDRESS_P): Deleted,
functionality moved to ...
(legitimate_scaled_address_p): New function, ...he
