Thanks! Added changelog and Pushed!
On 30-09-2024 18:39, David Faust wrote:
On 9/27/24 09:49, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
When traversing gimple to introduce CO-RE relocation entries to
expressions that are accesses to attributed perserve_access_index types,
the access is likely to be split in m
On 9/27/24 09:49, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
> When traversing gimple to introduce CO-RE relocation entries to
> expressions that are accesses to attributed perserve_access_index types,
> the access is likely to be split in multiple gimple statments.
> In order to keep doing the proper CO-RE conve
When traversing gimple to introduce CO-RE relocation entries to
expressions that are accesses to attributed perserve_access_index types,
the access is likely to be split in multiple gimple statments.
In order to keep doing the proper CO-RE convertion we will need to mark
the LHS tree nodes of gimpl
