On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.h
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,10 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> #ifndef GCC_INTERNAL_FN_H
> #define GCC_INTERNAL_FN_H
>
> +#include "insn-codes.h"
Just some very minor things.
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.cc b/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> index
> 5c9da73ea11f8060b18dcf513599c9694fa4f2ad..348bee35a35ae4ed9a8652f5349f430c2733e1cb
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> @@ -90,6 +90,71 @@ loo
Hi,
This is the updated patch and cover letter. Patches for inline and
gimple-op changes will follow soon.
DEF_INTERNAL_WIDENING_OPTAB_FN and DEF_INTERNAL_NARROWING_OPTAB_FN
are like DEF_INTERNAL_SIGNED_OPTAB_FN and DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN
respectively. With the exception that they provide
On Thu, 18 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> How about this?
>
> Not sure about the DEF_INTERNAL documentation I rewrote in internal-fn.def,
> was struggling to word these, so improvements welcome!
The even/odd variant optabs are also commutative_optab_p, so is
the vec_widen_sadd without h
How about this?
Not sure about the DEF_INTERNAL documentation I rewrote in
internal-fn.def, was struggling to word these, so improvements welcome!
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-04-25 Andre Vieira
Joel Hutton
Tamar Christina
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
(vec_
On Mon, 15 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>
> On 15/05/2023 12:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >>> On Fri, 12 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >>>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, 12 May 20
On 15/05/2023 12:01, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
On Fri, 12 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. T
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, 15 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > But I'm also not sure
>> > how much of that is really needed (it seems to be tied around
>> > optimizing optabs space?)
>>
>> Not sure what you mean by "this". Optabs space shouldn't be a pro
On Mon, 15 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, 12 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a
>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 12 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a few
>> >> changes, I think it's all a bit simpler now. I made s
On Fri, 12 May 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >
> >> I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a few
> >> changes, I think it's all a bit simpler now. I made some other changes to
> >> the
>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>> I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a few
>> changes, I think it's all a bit simpler now. I made some other changes to the
>> costing in tree-inline.cc and gimple-range-op.cc in which I t
On 12/05/2023 14:28, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a few
changes, I think it's all a bit simpler now. I made some other changes to the
costing in tree-inline.cc and gimple-range-op.cc
On Fri, 12 May 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a few
> changes, I think it's all a bit simpler now. I made some other changes to the
> costing in tree-inline.cc and gimple-range-op.cc in which I try to preserve
> the same beha
I have dealt with, I think..., most of your comments. There's quite a
few changes, I think it's all a bit simpler now. I made some other
changes to the costing in tree-inline.cc and gimple-range-op.cc in which
I try to preserve the same behaviour as we had with the tree codes
before. Also added
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>> This patch replaces the existing tree_code widen_plus and widen_minus
>> patterns with internal_fn versions.
>>
>> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_HILO_FN is like DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN except it provides
>> convenience wrappers for
On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> This patch replaces the existing tree_code widen_plus and widen_minus
> patterns with internal_fn versions.
>
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_HILO_FN is like DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN except it provides
> convenience wrappers for defining conversions that requi
This patch replaces the existing tree_code widen_plus and widen_minus
patterns with internal_fn versions.
DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_HILO_FN is like DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN except it
provides convenience wrappers for defining conversions that require a
hi/lo split, like widening and narrowing operations.
18 matches
Mail list logo
