Re: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-12-17 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 05:26:03PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:57:56PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > > -/* { dg-do run { target

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-12-14 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:57:56PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70117.c > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > -/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-linux* powerpc*-*-darwin* > powerpc*-*-aix* rs6000-*-* } } } */ > -

[PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-12-03 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
PowerPC: PR target/70117, Force long double to be IBM 128-bit. This patch replaces the following patch: | Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 00:37:10 -0500 | Subject: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117. | Message-ID: <20201121053710.gd17...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> |

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-11-23 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:37:10AM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > Since the test is explicitly checking for IBM extended double, do not try to > run it when long double is IEEE 128-bit. Before your change, it would explicitly use __ibm128 if that is not the same as long double. You need a

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-11-21 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:46:45AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:37 AM Michael Meissner > wrote: > > > > PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117. > > > > Since the test is explicitly checking for IBM extended double, do not try to > > run it when long double is IEE

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-11-21 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:37 AM Michael Meissner wrote: > > PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117. > > Since the test is explicitly checking for IBM extended double, do not try to > run it when long double is IEEE 128-bit. > > I have tested this patch and the first patch in the series on a

[PATCH 2/3] PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117.

2020-11-20 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
PowerPC: require IBM long double for pr70117. Since the test is explicitly checking for IBM extended double, do not try to run it when long double is IEEE 128-bit. I have tested this patch and the first patch in the series on a little endian power9 system with 3 compilers that have the 3 differen