Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipa-cp: Improve updating behavior when profile counts have gone bad

2023-03-10 Thread Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches
> Hi, > > Looking into the behavior of profile count updating in PR 107925, I > noticed that an option not considered possible was actually happening, > and - with the guesswork in place to distribute unexplained counts - > it simply can happen. Currently it is handled by dropping the counts > to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipa-cp: Improve updating behavior when profile counts have gone bad

2023-03-08 Thread Martin Jambor
Hello, I'd like to ping the patch below. Martin On Tue, Feb 21 2023, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > Looking into the behavior of profile count updating in PR 107925, I > noticed that an option not considered possible was actually happening, > and - with the guesswork in place to distribute unex

[PATCH 2/2] ipa-cp: Improve updating behavior when profile counts have gone bad

2023-02-21 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, Looking into the behavior of profile count updating in PR 107925, I noticed that an option not considered possible was actually happening, and - with the guesswork in place to distribute unexplained counts - it simply can happen. Currently it is handled by dropping the counts to local estimat