On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/30/21 10:48 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > r12-1829 corrected the access scope during partial specialization
> > > > matching of class templates, but
On 6/30/21 10:48 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
r12-1829 corrected the access scope during partial specialization
matching of class templates, but neglected the variable template case.
This patch moves the access scop
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > r12-1829 corrected the access scope during partial specialization
> > matching of class templates, but neglected the variable template case.
> > This patch moves the access scope adjustment to inside
> > most_
On 6/29/21 1:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
r12-1829 corrected the access scope during partial specialization
matching of class templates, but neglected the variable template case.
This patch moves the access scope adjustment to inside
most_specialized_partial_spec, so that all callers can benefit.
r12-1829 corrected the access scope during partial specialization
matching of class templates, but neglected the variable template case.
This patch moves the access scope adjustment to inside
most_specialized_partial_spec, so that all callers can benefit.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-li
