On 09/03/14 02:45, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
this is a followup to my previous PR-fixing patch. At ever more
places we currently do
if (!node->expand_thunk (false, whatever))
node->analyzed = true;
and we always set the flag when expand_thunk returns with false (it
only can when the fi
Hi,
this is a followup to my previous PR-fixing patch. At ever more
places we currently do
if (!node->expand_thunk (false, whatever))
node->analyzed = true;
and we always set the flag when expand_thunk returns with false (it
only can when the first parameter is false). So I thought it wo
