> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, 2016-06-09 13:24:10 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> > > definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> > > time, so the pathc is OK.
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2016-06-09 13:24:10 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> > definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> > time, so the pathc is OK.
>
> Sending
On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> time, so the pathc is OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Honza
Hi
Sending the final version where I added comments and I also cha
> 2016-06-01 Martin Liska
>
> * analyze_brprob.py: Cover new dump output format.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2016-06-01 Martin Liska
>
> * predict.c (dump_prediction): Add new argument.
> (enum predictor_reason): New enum.
> (struct predictor_hash): New struct.
>
Hi.
I'm sending second version of the patch, where I fixed dump_prediction function
to
dump a proper edge.
Thanks,
Martin
>From 0d82e8def140636fe186888a525fe84e329d676b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:29:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Add edge predictions pruning
contrib/ChangeLog:
2016-06-01 Martin Liska
* analyze_brprob.py: Cover new dump output format.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-06-01 Martin Liska
* predict.c (dump_prediction): Add new argument.
(enum predictor_reason): New enum.
(struct predictor_hash): New struct.