On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:16 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:50 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:34 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Andrew Pinski
> > >
> > > Instead of waiting for DCE to remove the unuse
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:50 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:34 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Andrew Pinski
> >
> > Instead of waiting for DCE to remove the unused statement,
> > and maybe optimize another conditional, it is better if
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:34 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> Instead of waiting for DCE to remove the unused statement,
> and maybe optimize another conditional, it is better if
> we don't move the statement and have the statement
> removed.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>
From: Andrew Pinski
Instead of waiting for DCE to remove the unused statement,
and maybe optimize another conditional, it is better if
we don't move the statement and have the statement
removed.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (used_in_seq): New function.
(match_simplify_repl