On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:16 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 16
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:16 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 15
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > OK, guess
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> > Richard Biener writes:
> > > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> > > SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> > > mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So w
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> > SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> > mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
> > you can now en
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 15
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:38 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > OK, guess
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, guess I was more looking at
> > > >
> > > > #define N 32
> > > > int foo (unsig
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > OK, guess I was more looking at
> > >
> > > #define N 32
> > > int foo (unsigned long *a, unsigned long * __restrict b,
> > > uns
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > OK, guess I was more looking at
> >
> > #define N 32
> > int foo (unsigned long *a, unsigned long * __restrict b,
> > unsigned int *c, unsigned int * __restrict d,
> > int n)
> > {
> >
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:48 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:48 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The following extends the existing
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> > Richard Biener writes:
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > T
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
>> > > SVE W
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> > SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> > mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
> > you can now en
Richard Biener writes:
> The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
> you can now enable masked vectorized epilogues (=1) or fully
> masked v
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> > > SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alte
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> > SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> > mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
> you can now enable masked vectorized
The following extends the existing loop masking support using
SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
you can now enable masked vectorized epilogues (=1) or fully
masked vector loops (=2).
What's missing
22 matches
Mail list logo