On 08/07/14 09:33, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 21:29 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:22:58PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
+class GTY(()) rtx_insn_list : public rtx_def
+{
+ /* No extra fields, but adds invariant: (GET_CODE (X) == INSN_LIST).
some nice f
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 21:29 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:22:58PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > +class GTY(()) rtx_insn_list : public rtx_def
> > +{
> > + /* No extra fields, but adds invariant: (GET_CODE (X) == INSN_LIST).
>
> some nice future work would be to see
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:22:58PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> +class GTY(()) rtx_insn_list : public rtx_def
> +{
> + /* No extra fields, but adds invariant: (GET_CODE (X) == INSN_LIST).
some nice future work would be to see if these can stop being rtxen at
all and just have a insn and next poi
gcc/
* coretypes.h (class rtx_insn_list): Add forward declaration.
* rtl.h (class rtx_insn_list): New subclass of rtx_def
(is_a_helper ::test): New.
(rtx_insn_list::next): New.
(rtx_insn_list::insn): New.
(gen_rtx_INSN_LIST): Add prototype.
*
