Re: [PATCH 19/41] analyzer: new files: analyzer.{cc|h}

2020-01-10 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 08:53 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > Jeff reviewed an earlier version of this here: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00503.html > > My response: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00809.h

Re: [PATCH 19/41] analyzer: new files: analyzer.{cc|h}

2020-01-10 Thread Jeff Law
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > Jeff reviewed an earlier version of this here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00503.html > My response: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00809.html > I have followup patches that implement the function_set

[PATCH 19/41] analyzer: new files: analyzer.{cc|h}

2020-01-08 Thread David Malcolm
Jeff reviewed an earlier version of this here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00503.html My response: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00809.html I have followup patches that implement the function_set idea. TODO: I haven't yet addressed the is_setjmp_call_p/is_lo