Re: [PATCH 17/44] RISC-V: Avoid extraneous EQ or NE operation in cond-move expansion

On 11/18/23 22:38, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: In the non-zero case there is no need for the conditional value used by Ventana and Zicond integer conditional operations to be specifically 1. Regardless we canonicalize it by producing an extraneous conditional-set operation, such as with the seque

[PATCH 17/44] RISC-V: Avoid extraneous EQ or NE operation in cond-move expansion

In the non-zero case there is no need for the conditional value used by Ventana and Zicond integer conditional operations to be specifically 1. Regardless we canonicalize it by producing an extraneous conditional-set operation, such as with the sequence below: (insn 22 6 23 2 (set (reg:DI 141)