> gcc/ada/
> * gcc-interface/utils.c (gnat_poplevel): Use block_chainon.
OK, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
> "Nathan" == Nathan Froyd writes:
Nathan> gcc/java/
Nathan> * decl.c (poplevel): Use BLOCK_CHAIN and block_chainon.
This is ok.
Tom
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd
> wrote:
> > BLOCKs have a TREE_CHAIN and a TREE_TYPE; TREE_TYPE is useless for
> > blocks, but we can't remove TREE_TYPE without also removing TREE_CHAIN.
> > This patch lays the gro
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> BLOCKs have a TREE_CHAIN and a TREE_TYPE; TREE_TYPE is useless for
> blocks, but we can't remove TREE_TYPE without also removing TREE_CHAIN.
> This patch lays the groundwork to do just that. It changes places that
> use chainon on BLOCKs to u
BLOCKs have a TREE_CHAIN and a TREE_TYPE; TREE_TYPE is useless for
blocks, but we can't remove TREE_TYPE without also removing TREE_CHAIN.
This patch lays the groundwork to do just that. It changes places that
use chainon on BLOCKs to use block_chainon, which works identically to
chainon except it
