New plan-- this patch is entirely pointless! I have reverted it in a
local build and had no regressions.
As such, simply do not review or consider this patch. I am not not
planning on re-sending the patchset even though it adjusts the patch
numbers because it is such an arduous process given that
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 1:19 AM Zopolis0 wrote:
>
> I was reverting a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0 as it removed code
> for Java, but I may have misunderstood the change and made the incorrect
> edits.
The change is fixing a bug (setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE from a CTOR in
debug stmts) an
I was reverting a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0 as it removed code
for Java, but I may have misunderstood the change and made the incorrect
edits.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 07:16, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:43 AM Zopolis0 via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
>
> That's wron
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:43 AM Zopolis0 via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
That's wrong and the comment you remove explains why.
From c38422135e51852cdfe3236176afd0e2e3c53707 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maximilian Downey Twiss
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:16:15 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 14/56] middle-end: Set TREE_ADDRESSABLE in folding debug
stmts.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-fold.cc (canonicalize_constructor_val): Set
