Hi,
On Thu, Jun 26 2025, Michal Jireš wrote:
> On 6/25/25 4:14 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when building GCC with clang, it warns that the private member suffix
>> in class ltrans_file_cache (defined in lto-ltrans-cache.h) is not used
>> which indeed looks like it is the case. This pat
On 6/25/25 4:14 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
when building GCC with clang, it warns that the private member suffix
in class ltrans_file_cache (defined in lto-ltrans-cache.h) is not used
which indeed looks like it is the case. This patch therefore removes
it along with its initialization in the
Hi,
when building GCC with clang, it warns that the private member suffix
in class ltrans_file_cache (defined in lto-ltrans-cache.h) is not used
which indeed looks like it is the case. This patch therefore removes
it along with its initialization in the constructor.
Bootstrapped and tested on x8
