On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. Nothing to
> see here.
>
> -Nathan
>
> gcc/
> * tree.def (CASE_LABEL_EXPR): Add an operand.
> * tree.h (CASE_CHAIN): Use TREE_OPERAND instead of TREE_CHAIN.
>
This cause
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd
>> wrote:
>>> Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. Nothing to
>>> see here.
>>
>> I wonder if there isn't a bet
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd
> wrote:
>> Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. Nothing to
>> see here.
>
> I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
> operand 2 of SWITC
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:19:14PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd
> wrote:
> > Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. Nothing to
> > see here.
>
> I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
> opera
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. Nothing to
> see here.
I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
operand 2 of SWITCH_EXPRs.
Richard.
> -Nathan
>
> gcc/
> * tree.def (CASE_LAB
Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. Nothing to
see here.
-Nathan
gcc/
* tree.def (CASE_LABEL_EXPR): Add an operand.
* tree.h (CASE_CHAIN): Use TREE_OPERAND instead of TREE_CHAIN.
diff --git a/gcc/tree.def b/gcc/tree.def
index eb94ad2..9c6606d 100644
--- a/g